I like the first one, they (in my opinion), did the best job! \\ They stayed together well, they were all audible and they had a good leader!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I believe that period 7 group 3 did the best. They had a very clean performance and they picked great tempos and rythms that would balance eachother out and sound great!
I think group 2 did a great job, especially since you did 3 different beats instead of just 2. It was very creative & you stayed together. Your clapping was loud & clear.
The group that I think that did the best was group two, because they did a good job on staying together, staying on tempo and were counting loud! Group two was my favorite, they were very creative!
My group, group 3 I think we could have done better if we made it a little slower but other then that we did pretty good. I personally made a mistake clapping.
Group 2 did a great job! They kept a nice beat and stook together! They were together the whole time and fit the beats together perfectly! they put some work in it for sure!
i think my group ( GROUP 3) did a really great job . But we could have listened to each other more . We could have done a better job ending together . Also I think our rhythm and tempo could have been a bit better
I think my group (group 1) did a great job at saying the notes loud enough and clapping loud enough too. But I think we should have worked on staying together on the last notes.
Our group (GROUP 2) could have practiced the measures more the second time when we did it without counting. A good thing we did was all staying together since we had 3 groups instead of 2.
My group (Group 2, Period 7) could have worked on staying steady because we sped up at the end a little bit, but we did that when we weren't counting. Another thing we could have done better is listening to one another because we were off beat a tiny bit at the non counting part of our routine for clapping.
I think my group (GROUP 2) could have had a slower tempo and the end. Also I think that at certain parts people forgot what we going to do and we hit the beat at the wrong time.
I think my group (Period 7 group 3) did a great job of being accurate and staying together. I feel we could have gone slower, and I think we rushed through it. I also think that Period 7 group 1 did a wonderful job of staying together and being loud and clear!
Group 3 did good as well but they could've worked on it a little worked on it or but a little more effort in it. At times the group wasnt together but they picked it up as soon as it happened. so all smiles!
In group 2 I think they did the best because of their 2 groups into 3 small groups which really brought the sound and beat together to a good rhythm and song overall.
I think my group (group 2) should work on the tempo of the rhythm because we were a little to fast in some parts of the measures. It would have been better if we were a little bit slower.I loved how my counted together and the rhythm sounded great!!!
My group (Group 2) could have done better by ending together. I believe that we did do the best though because we had 3 creative rhythms and stayed together for majority of the time.
I think my group (group 2 period 7) did really well with clappong loud. One thing our group could have worked on was staying on beat a little bit more. But other than that we did good!
hiiiiiii
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 did really good at staying on beat even though they had 3 beats and that was cool!
ReplyDeleteGroup 1 did a good job of staying together and going slow and steady.
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 in 7th period was awesome with there beats nice 1 (:P)
ReplyDeleteGroup 2, had a good seady beat for the 3 groups they did. they were successful!!!!
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 was the most successful
ReplyDeleteI loved how group 2 had 3 groups and the stayed together. It sounded great!
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 was very successful because they were able to make the most out of their rhythm.
ReplyDeleteI like the first one, they (in my opinion), did the best job!
ReplyDelete\\ They stayed together well, they were all audible and they had a good leader!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:D
ReplyDeletePeriod 7, Group 2 did the best. I like how they made 3 groups and they had a good tempo.
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 did a great job with keeping a steady beat!
ReplyDeletePeriod 7 Group 2 did the best job with the three beats and great tempo and listening to each other go group 2!!!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteI think Period 7 Group 2 did the best thanks to their slow tempo and great intermingling of the different rhythms Good Job!!!
ReplyDeleteI disagree i tihnk period 4 group 2 did the best and even though we had a lot of absent people in our group ;)
Deleteya, ya I think that my group needs more work on beeing clearer and staying together better!!!
ReplyDeletePeriod 7 Group 2 did good because they had a different set up then others
ReplyDeletei think that group 2 did a really goood job on spliting tem into 3 groups awesome job.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Period 7 Group 2 did a very good job. They stayed together and they had an unique set up.
ReplyDeleteI feel that group 2 did the best job even though they had 3 seperate groups they still sounded great!
ReplyDeleteGroup two did an awesome job on staying together.
ReplyDeleteI believe that period 7 group 3 did the best. They had a very clean performance and they picked great tempos and rythms that would balance eachother out and sound great!
ReplyDeleteI think that they did a great job on working together and getting there project done enough to perfected it
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 did a good job staying on beat with each other :D
ReplyDeleteI think group 2 did a great job, especially since you did 3 different beats instead of just 2. It was very creative & you stayed together. Your clapping was loud & clear.
ReplyDeleteI think period 7 group 2 did a good job because they had a good tempo and it was cool how they split up into three different groups
ReplyDeleteThe group that I think that did the best was group two, because they did a good job on staying together, staying on tempo and were counting loud! Group two was my favorite, they were very creative!
ReplyDeletegroup 3 did a great job
ReplyDeleteI think period 7 group 2 did a good job because they had a good beat.
ReplyDeleteI think that thay had good rhythm and pattern
ReplyDeleteI think that group 3 could have All counted out load louder and also stayed together a little bit better
ReplyDeleteI feel this Period 7 Group 2 did a good job with not only counting but staying together
ReplyDeleteI think every group stayed on beat.
ReplyDeleteI think my group (group two) could have listen to each other better and stay together more with the rest of the group.
ReplyDeleteIn my group (group 1) we could have done better at sticking together with everyone having more practice by everyone cooperating well together.
ReplyDeleteMy group, group 3 I think we could have done better if we made it a little slower but other then that we did pretty good. I personally made a mistake clapping.
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 did a great job! They kept a nice beat and stook together! They were together the whole time and fit the beats together perfectly! they put some work in it for sure!
ReplyDeletei think my group ( GROUP 3) did a really great job . But we could have listened to each other more . We could have done a better job ending together . Also I think our rhythm and tempo could have been a bit better
ReplyDeleteI think That This Group Kept a Steady Beat And Tempo Even Though They Had 3 Small GRoups
ReplyDeleteI think group 2 (my group) did a great job with being creative and with accuracy
ReplyDeleteI think my group (group 1) did a great job at saying the notes loud enough and clapping loud enough too. But I think we should have worked on staying together on the last notes.
ReplyDeleteMy group (Period 7 Group 3) did a good job staying together and clapping the right notes.
ReplyDeleteGroup 3 should of practiced more on the measures.
ReplyDeleteOur group (GROUP 2) could have practiced the measures more the second time when we did it without counting. A good thing we did was all staying together since we had 3 groups instead of 2.
ReplyDeleteMy group (Group 2, Period 7) could have worked on staying steady because we sped up at the end a little bit, but we did that when we weren't counting. Another thing we could have done better is listening to one another because we were off beat a tiny bit at the non counting part of our routine for clapping.
ReplyDeleteI think my group (GROUP 2) could have had a slower tempo and the end. Also I think that at certain parts people forgot what we going to do and we hit the beat at the wrong time.
ReplyDeleteI think my group(Group1 period 7) has a good beat but we could of been more ethusiastic.And focused to the camera and counted louder
ReplyDeleteI feel this magical group i was a part of (Group 1) could have been more together towards the middle of the presentation
ReplyDeleteTHE MEASUREMENTS OF MY GROUP ,GROUP 3 BLENDED TOGETHER WELL ,BUT WE COULD HAVE COUNTED THE BEATS LOUDER SO EVERYONE COULD HAVE HEARD.
ReplyDeleteI think that group 2 did amazing because they had 3 groups and were together for the entire rhythm.
ReplyDeleteI think my group (Period 7 group 3) did a great job of being accurate and staying together. I feel we could have gone slower, and I think we rushed through it. I also think that Period 7 group 1 did a wonderful job of staying together and being loud and clear!
ReplyDeleteI believe Group 3 should of clapped louder and more clear.
ReplyDeleteGroup 3 did good as well but they could've worked on it a little worked on it or but a little more effort in it. At times the group wasnt together but they picked it up as soon as it happened. so all smiles!
ReplyDeleteIn group 2 I think they did the best because of their 2 groups into 3 small groups which really brought the sound and beat together to a good rhythm and song overall.
ReplyDeleteI think my group (group 2) should work on the tempo of the rhythm because we were a little to fast in some parts of the measures. It would have been better if we were a little bit slower.I loved how my counted together and the rhythm sounded great!!!
ReplyDeleteMy group (Group 2) could have done better by ending together. I believe that we did do the best though because we had 3 creative rhythms and stayed together for majority of the time.
ReplyDeleteI thought that group 1 my group could have, listened a little better by, listening to one eacheother more towards the end of the measure.
ReplyDeleteMy group (group 2) Could Have Improved on the tempo and listen to each other, overall i think we did a good job.
ReplyDeleteI think the best group was group 2 . They had a really nice tempo . A great rhythm . And it was cool how they did so well with 3 groups.
ReplyDelete:D
ReplyDeleteI was in group1
ReplyDeleteI think we should have clapped more on the beat. We could have counted lounder.
Period 7 Group 2 did good because instead of having 2 groups they had 3 groups and the beat was really good and they clapped good together.
ReplyDeletePeriod 7 Group 3** My mistake.
ReplyDeleteI think my group (group 2 period 7) did really well with clappong loud. One thing our group could have worked on was staying on beat a little bit more. But other than that we did good!
ReplyDeleteI think that my group (group 3) did well, but we had trouble counting. We count have counted a little louder and we would have been so much better.
ReplyDeleteI Think Period 4 group 1 did a good job because they stayed together counted,out loudly,clapped loudly,good tempo and also a steady beat.
ReplyDeleteI think group 2 did a good job picking a good tempo.
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 Period 7 did a good job
ReplyDeletethe group i think did the best was group 1 peroid 4 they did really well together and stayed on beat
ReplyDelete